-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: setting column on spawned process #459
Comments
This is not possible. There's no See this Node.js issue: nodejs/node#31409 I agree, it would be very useful. |
Ah I see. That's a shame... Thanks for those links. Upvoted the Node.js issue—let me know if there's anything else I can do to help push for it. I was experimenting and I saw I could pass in I'm not very good with streams/tty, so excuse me if I'm just completely off, but I was wondering if it's possible to pass in a fake tty write stream that just collects the output. Probably not though if it's just a wrapper for the internal tty binding. |
Not as far as I know, but it's been years since I tried to do something like that. Maybe try asking on Stack Overflow? The answer (if any) would benefit a lot of Node.js people. |
Closing as the issue is not related to Node.js. |
Feature request
Would like to be able to specify the
column
androws
for the stdout of the spawned process.Motivation
I'm using execa to spawn a command that is printing text that is wrapped. It doesn't wrap when I run it directly or if I set
stdio: 'inherit'
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: