You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The duplication was seemingly introduced in #1794 to avoid a circular dependency, but I'm not seeing one. It seems like ssz_types could depend on serde_utils and that would be fine (serde_utils doesn't depend on ssz_types, even transitively).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
We currently have two copies of the
quoted_u64
serde utils in:consensus/serde_utils
andconsensus/ssz_types/serde_utils
The duplication was seemingly introduced in #1794 to avoid a circular dependency, but I'm not seeing one. It seems like
ssz_types
could depend onserde_utils
and that would be fine (serde_utils
doesn't depend onssz_types
, even transitively).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: