Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is a Chocolatey package interesting? #505

Closed
ErichDonGubler opened this issue Feb 14, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Is a Chocolatey package interesting? #505

ErichDonGubler opened this issue Feb 14, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@ErichDonGubler
Copy link

I'd be more than happy to create an automatically updating Chocolatey package to hand off to whoever wants it -- is that interesting at all? I use Chocolatey to automate my own workflow right now, and this is a slick tool I'd love to add to my automatic toolbelt. :)

@sharkdp
Copy link
Owner

sharkdp commented Feb 14, 2019

Absolutely - I'm always happy if there are people who are willing to create new packaging options. Once a package is available, we can add installation instructions to the README.

Please note, however, that I am personally not going to put time into maintenance of these packages, especially if it concerns a system that I am not using myself.

@rasmuskriest
Copy link
Contributor

@ErichDonGubler Have you made any process on this? I would be more than happy to help!

@ErichDonGubler
Copy link
Author

@rasmuskriest: Nope! I've spent the last little while transitioning to a new Rust day job -- I've switched from developing primarily on the Windows platform to Linux, so it's lower priority for me and will take longer for me to get around to. Feel free to take the reins if you need it! :)

@sharkdp
Copy link
Owner

sharkdp commented Apr 27, 2019

This has already been resolved by @rasmuskriest in #541.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants