Get into TechEmpower benchmarks

[seemethere]

I think it'd be useful to have sanic in the TechEmpower benchmarks so that more users can discover it.

The instructions to get in are found here:
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=code

And sample applications can be found here:
https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks

[ludovic-gasc]

Hi,

I'm the maintainer of AsyncIO branch of TechEmpower Benchmarks (BTW, you've a typo in the title).
I'm working to integrate sanic in the test suite with multi-worker pattern to be fair with other benchmarks.

Stay tuned, I'll publish a branch when I'll be ready.

Have a nice week.

[channelcat]

@GMLudo awesome! I hope to have multi-worker (using python multiprocessing and loop.create_server with reuse_port) pushed by tonight, so hopefully that saves you time :). The syntax should just be

app.run(host='0.0.0.0.0', port=80, workers=4)

[channelcat]

Just an update - multiprocessing was added with pr #57 and was pushed to pypi as well

[ludovic-gasc]

Hi @channelcat, thanks for the multi-worker implementation.

I've made a first draft: Eyepea/FrameworkBenchmarks@2151722
Interested by your feedbacks.

I need a patch in Sanic to work: Eyepea@7dcdc62
I'm sending a PR for that.

I've did some measures with wrk, it seems unbelievable when I compare with existing benchmark suite, at least on my hardware, congratulations ;-)
However, I don't publish numbers, I prefer to wait that TechEmpower publishes official numbers for the next round.

I hope to finish to integrate the complete test suite, with postgresql, mysql and redis support during the week-end for an official PR to TechEmpower.

Have a nice week.

[ludovic-gasc]

Hi @channelcat,

I don't forget you, but I've several constraints right now. I hope to finish for the end of this week.

[seemethere]

@GMLudo Do we have an update on this?

[ludovic-gasc]

@seemethere I've 500+ e-mails to read but I've made a branch for that.
It should be ok for round 14.

[feluxe]

I just saw the benchmarks from 2018 and am a little surprised to find Sanic so far down the list:

https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r15&hw=ph&test=plaintext

[yunstanford]

not sure how it hooks up, but sth. is wrong obviously as you can tell from the error count and the number...
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r15&hw=ph&test=json shows different.
I'm not sure how the number comes out..

[r0fls]

21 requests per second 😢 where is the file they used for testing?

…

Sent from my Phone

On Feb 15, 2018, at 3:32 PM, 7 ***@***.***> wrote: not sure how it hooks up, but sth. is wrong obviously as you can tell from the error count and the number... https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r15&hw=ph&test=json shows different. I'm not sure how the number comes out.. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[idxn]

@r0fls https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/tree/master/frameworks/Python/sanic

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If this is incorrect, please respond with an update. Thank you for your contributions.

[stalkerg]

it seems like broken right now, can somebody fix sanic in TechEmpower?

[stalkerg]

Did PR TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks#9304