Skip to content

polynomial ring over pAdics doesn't respect the sparse argument #9929

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
sagetrac-ylchapuy mannequin opened this issue Sep 17, 2010 · 6 comments
Closed

polynomial ring over pAdics doesn't respect the sparse argument #9929

sagetrac-ylchapuy mannequin opened this issue Sep 17, 2010 · 6 comments

Comments

@sagetrac-ylchapuy
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-ylchapuy mannequin commented Sep 17, 2010

sage: R.<x> = PolynomialRing(Zp(17), sparse=True)
sage: x**(10**10)
Traceback (most recent call last)
...
MemoryError:

This should work (and be fast). The solution is probably in the file polynomial_ring_constructor.py in the function single_variate.

CC: @roed314 @xcaruso

Component: algebra

Keywords: padicIMA

Author: Julian Rüth

Reviewer: Julian Rüth

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9929

@sagetrac-ylchapuy sagetrac-ylchapuy mannequin added this to the sage-5.11 milestone Sep 17, 2010
@sagetrac-ylchapuy

This comment has been minimized.

@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-5.11, sage-5.12 Aug 13, 2013
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.1, sage-6.2 Jan 30, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.2, sage-6.3 May 6, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.3, sage-6.4 Aug 10, 2014
@saraedum
Copy link
Member

Changed keywords from none to padicIMA

@saraedum
Copy link
Member

Reviewer: Julian Rüth

@saraedum
Copy link
Member

comment:6

works for me.

@saraedum
Copy link
Member

Author: Julian Rüth

@saraedum saraedum removed this from the sage-6.4 milestone Jul 26, 2018
@embray
Copy link
Contributor

embray commented Feb 26, 2019

comment:8

Presuming these are all correctly reviewed as either duplicate, invalid, or wontfix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants