-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 553
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Symmetric Function coercion issue #9755
Comments
Author: Jason Bandlow |
comment:1
Ready for review. |
comment:2
Note for combinat people: I've put this patch in the 'needs review' section of the queue. |
Reviewer: Mike Hansen |
comment:3
Looks good to me. |
comment:4
Could someone make the commit string a bit more descriptive, e.g., |
Attachment: trac_9755_hall_littlewood_coercions-jb.patch.gz |
comment:5
Replying to @qed777:
Oops, sorry about that. Fixed. |
comment:7
Could you move
|
comment:8
Sorry. How's the new version (I forgot to overwrite the old one)? |
comment:9
Replying to @jbandlow:
No worries. V2 looks good. Thanks! |
Merged: sage-4.6.alpha2 |
The following was reported to me by Nicolas Thiéry and Lenny Tevlin.
The same error occurs with
Ph(s.one())
, althoughP(s.one())
works.CC: @sagetrac-sage-combinat
Component: combinatorics
Keywords: symmetric functions
Author: Jason Bandlow
Reviewer: Mike Hansen
Merged: sage-4.6.alpha2
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9755
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: