Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

misformatted docstrings in sage.misc.abstract_method (easy fix) #6435

Closed
loefflerd mannequin opened this issue Jun 27, 2009 · 5 comments
Closed

misformatted docstrings in sage.misc.abstract_method (easy fix) #6435

loefflerd mannequin opened this issue Jun 27, 2009 · 5 comments

Comments

@loefflerd
Copy link
Mannequin

loefflerd mannequin commented Jun 27, 2009

Building the documentation for 4.1.alpha2, there is a warning:

WARNING: /home/david/sage-4.1.alpha2/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/misc/abstract_method.py:docstring of sage.misc.abstract_method.abstract_method:19: (WARNING/2) Literal block expected; none found.

This is due to a rogue "::" in a docstring introduced by #6097.

CC: @nthiery

Component: documentation

Keywords: ReST docstring formatting

Author: John Palmieri

Reviewer: Nicolas Thiéry

Merged: sage-4.1.rc0

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6435

@loefflerd loefflerd mannequin added this to the sage-4.1 milestone Jun 27, 2009
@jhpalmieri
Copy link
Member

Author: John Palmieri

@jhpalmieri
Copy link
Member

comment:1

Attachment: trac_6435.patch.gz

Here's a patch.

@nthiery
Copy link
Contributor

nthiery commented Jun 27, 2009

comment:2

Oops, sorry for introducing this, and thanks for fixing it! Positive review.

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented Jun 28, 2009

Reviewer: Nicolas Thiéry

@rlmill
Copy link
Mannequin

rlmill mannequin commented Jul 2, 2009

Merged: sage-4.1.rc0

@rlmill rlmill mannequin removed the s: positive review label Jul 2, 2009
@rlmill rlmill mannequin closed this as completed Jul 2, 2009
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants