-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 602
more scalar conversions #31716
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Branch: u/vdelecroix/31716 |
Author: Vincent Delecroix |
New commits:
|
Commit: |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:7
LGTM except you lost the doctest for |
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:11
Once the patchbot comes back green, positive review. |
comment:12
green. Thanks. |
Changed branch from u/vdelecroix/31716 to |
Changed commit from |
comment:14
I suspect (but have not checked) that #32078 was caused by the changes here. |
Following #10147, we extend conversion to scalars for polynomials, multi-polynomials and fraction fields.
The attached branch allows the following construction
See the original report from asksage.
Component: basic arithmetic
Author: Vincent Delecroix
Branch:
e40555a
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31716
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: