-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 601
Fix weight of Nakajima monomials #18722
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Last 10 new commits:
|
Commit: |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:3
The following example failed with the original commit:
A conditional was added to Some doctests needed to be updated so that the input used the extended weight lattice in affine examples. Doctests passed on my machine, so if you agree with these changes, then you may set the ticket to positive review on my behalf. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:5
Works for me. Thanks! |
Reviewer: Ben Salisbury |
Changed branch from public/crystals/fix_nakajima_monomials-18722 to |
With #18453, all weights are computed as the difference of the highest weight to what should be the weight. In particular, any highest weight element has weight 0.
I also make Nakajima monomials as classical crystals for the finite types.
CC: @sagetrac-sage-combinat @bsalisbury1 @anneschilling
Component: combinatorics
Keywords: crystals, nakajima monomials
Author: Travis Scrimshaw
Branch/Commit:
4eb38e2
Reviewer: Ben Salisbury
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18722
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: