-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 553
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
a quick way to create trees #15121
Comments
Dependencies: #11529 |
Changed dependencies from #11529 to none |
comment:2
now ready for review ! But where is the bot ? Still at the beach ? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Changed keywords from tree to trees |
comment:5
Hey Frederic, Could you move Also (more of a pet-peeve of mine, so you can ignore this), I don't like
(or an sequence of Thanks, Travis |
Attachment: trac_15121_hexacode_for_trees-fc.patch.gz |
comment:6
Humm, this does not seem possible, because there is no class AbstractTrees (with an s at the end) Indeed, it does not seem reasonable to put that into the class AbstractTree, because it would mean one has to build a tree before one can build another one.. |
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
comment:7
Ah, my bad. I thought there was a common parent class. Looks good to me. Thanks. |
comment:8
Thanks a lot Travis. |
Merged: sage-5.13.beta2 |
I propose a method to create (unlabelled) trees conveniently.
One enters a sequence of hexadecimal numbers, and this is converted into a rooted tree.
CC: @sagetrac-sage-combinat
Component: combinatorics
Keywords: trees
Author: Frédéric Chapoton
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw
Merged: sage-5.13.beta2
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15121
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: