-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 601
Let Mathematica free integration work with definite integrals #14764
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
comment:5
This seems fixed in recent Sage versions. IN 9.2.beta0:
|
comment:6
Needs doctest if these aren't already tested (which they may be). |
comment:7
Replying to @kcrisman:
Right. Putting this to |
Author: Emmanuel Charpentier |
Changed branch from u/charpent/let_mathematica_free_integration_work_with_definite_integrals to none |
comment:10
Added relevant doctests to src/sage/symbolics/integratin/external.py, which pass for me. ==> |
New commits:
|
Commit: |
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
comment:12
Some fixes are needed: - ::
- Check that :trac:`14764` is resolved:
+ Check that :trac:`14764` is resolved:: |
comment:13
Aaaarghhh!!! Sphinx is exceedingly prone to punctuation errors. I'm on it. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:15
Done. |
Changed reviewer from Travis Scrimshaw to Travis Scrimshaw, Frédéric Chapoton |
comment:16
allons-y ! |
Changed branch from u/charpent/let_mathematica_free_integration_work_with_definite_integrals to |
Changed commit from |
comment:18
I think it was fixed in #25501 |
See this ask.sagemath question. Apparently
so that would be useful to fix. Since it currently returns an indefinite integral when we ask for a definite one, I'll classify this as a defect.
Component: calculus
Author: Emmanuel Charpentier
Branch:
18385a7
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw, Frédéric Chapoton
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14764
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: