-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 601
Incorrect integral in Maxima #13733
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
comment:1
According to the upstream report, that problem is also fixed here and there is also a commit of the integral in question as a test.
So I guess when the next Maxima after 5.29.1 is ready and we put it in, we can try to close this report with a doctest. |
Upstream: Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release. |
comment:2
See #13973 for where we might fix this. |
comment:6
Maxima 5.33 returns the answer without asking any questions. |
comment:7
Great, then all that's needed is a doctest once #13973 is ready.
|
comment:8
Unfortunately the fact that Sage loads the |
comment:10
See also #12731. |
comment:11
Replying to @pjbruin:
Maybe but 5.35 is back to original ( |
comment:12
Replying to @pjbruin:
Maybe but Sage+Maxima-5.35 without |
comment:13
In SageMath 7.6.beta2, the answer appears to be correct up to simplification (probably thanks to Maxima commit
Should we add this as a doctest and declare the bug to be fixed? |
comment:14
I vote yes. |
Author: Peter Bruin |
Commit: |
Changed upstream from Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release. to none |
Reviewer: Ralf Stephan |
Changed branch from u/pbruin/13733-doctest_fixed_integral to |
Changed commit from |
comment:19
On one of the 32-bit buildbots:
|
Changed branch from |
comment:20
The doctest should now be more robust. |
Commit: |
Changed reviewer from Ralf Stephan to Ralf Stephan, Frédéric Chapoton |
Changed branch from u/pbruin/13733-doctest_fixed_integral to |
comment:23
Follow-up: a bug with this integral reappared in recent Maxima release, see #30063 |
Changed commit from |
See this ask.sagemath.org question.
But according to the poster it is pi log(2) / 8. And indeed in the most recent Maxima (5.28) we have
though with the interaction this is not an improvement we can immediately use.
Component: calculus
Author: Peter Bruin
Branch:
59bb147
Reviewer: Ralf Stephan, Frédéric Chapoton
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13733
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: