Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we please cut a 3.3.0 release? #741

Closed
ioquatix opened this issue Apr 20, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

Can we please cut a 3.3.0 release? #741

ioquatix opened this issue Apr 20, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@ioquatix
Copy link
Member

There are many interface fixes that forward to the underlying IO which I'd like to take advantage of.

@rhenium
Copy link
Member

rhenium commented Apr 26, 2024

Agreed. I will try to check remaining open issues soon.

@nogweii
Copy link

nogweii commented Jun 27, 2024

Another vote for a 3.3.0 release. In my case I have need to sign using an Ed25519 key and the recently merged #761 adds support for that.

@bdewater
Copy link
Contributor

With the next Ruby version soon, now might be a good time?

@hsbt
Copy link
Member

hsbt commented Dec 3, 2024

@rhenium Thank you for maintaining always. I'm preparing to final release of Ruby 3.4.

Could you consider to release openssl 3.3.0 while recent weeks?

@junaruga
Copy link
Member

junaruga commented Dec 18, 2024

The openssl gem 3.2.1 was released! #815 (comment)

Edited:

There are many interface fixes that forward to the underlying IO which I'd like to take advantage of.

You may need to wait for the openssl gem 3.3.0. I suppose that the openssl gem 3.2.1 only addes bug fixes since openssl gem 3.2.0.

@rhenium
Copy link
Member

rhenium commented Dec 18, 2024

I'm sorry it took so long. I'm preparing the changelog for v3.3.

@rhenium
Copy link
Member

rhenium commented Dec 21, 2024

#827

I've pushed v3.3.0 to rubygems.org.

@rhenium rhenium closed this as completed Dec 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants