Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

READMEs #11

Closed
maelle opened this issue Oct 18, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

READMEs #11

maelle opened this issue Oct 18, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@maelle
Copy link

maelle commented Oct 18, 2019

Topic

How to write clear and compelling READMEs.

Who is the audience?

Package developers
Maybe people interested in starting to contributed: docs are a good way to start and as an outsider you might write a better pitch for the package?

Why is this important?

I often read READMEs that could be improved and every package needs one, especially since the pitch that the README is can be re-used elsewhere.
Most potential users of a package have very little time so if the README loses them they won't try to use the package, or they'll lose time using a package that's not adapted to their needs (because the README was misleading).
It's also a topic closely related to "writing a good pre-submission inquiry".

What should be covered?

What's a good README, how to write one, who can give you feedback on it.
Also some tricks specific to R (usethis' README template, re-use of sections for the vignette).

Suggested speakers or contributors

  • one of the editors or a reviewer who reviewed several packages could explain how they read READMEs.

Resources you would recommend to the audience

https://www.writethedocs.org/blog/newsletter-july-2019/#readmes-on-readmes-and-other-readme-related-resources
the discussion started by @noamross in ropensci/software-review-meta#55

@maelle maelle added the 0/idea label Oct 18, 2019
@maelle
Copy link
Author

maelle commented Nov 5, 2019

I'm planning a R-hub blog post about the topic. r-hub/blog#29

@stefaniebutland
Copy link
Contributor

Content copied to new issue #21 (comment). Closing this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants