fix(storage): Stronger requirement on input range for iter and scan in StateStore

[jon-chuang]

I hereby agree to the terms of the Singularity Data, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Stronger requirement on input range for iter and scan in StateStore

Checklist

• I have written necessary rustdoc comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

Fix: #6104

[wenym1]

#6130 is working on a refactor on full key. After this refactor, the passed in key will not be prefixed with table id anymore, and then we will have enforced such requirement in our interface and does not need to introduce extra check.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #6147 (3069c61) into main (a3fac7f) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 93.19%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6147      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.82%   74.83%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         931      931              
  Lines      148973   149120     +147     
==========================================
+ Hits       111467   111594     +127     
- Misses      37506    37526      +20     

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust	74.83% <93.19%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/storage/src/hummock/state_store.rs	24.65% <ø> (ø)
src/storage/src/store.rs	30.00% <ø> (ø)
.../storage/hummock_test/src/hummock_storage_tests.rs	94.83% <93.19%> (-0.24%)	⬇️
src/batch/src/executor/group_top_n.rs	68.07% <0.00%> (-6.63%)	⬇️
src/connector/src/source/filesystem/file_common.rs	80.80% <0.00%> (+0.44%)	⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more