add CursorMove for next end of word
#75
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rhysd
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2024
|
This feature was included in v0.5.2 release. |
|
thank you for fixing my regression 😅 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
for #74; it's a pretty niche use case though, so I understand if it doesn't make sense to merge.
I realized the existing
find_word_end_forward()doesn't have the same behavior as going to the next end of word in vim, as it instead places the cursor immediately after the last character at the next end of word.So, I added a
find_word_end_next(), which more closely emulates the expected behavior (moving the cursor on top of the last character at the next end of word).