Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Definition lists look different with sphinx 2.0 #752

Closed
lazka opened this issue Apr 19, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #755
Closed

Definition lists look different with sphinx 2.0 #752

lazka opened this issue Apr 19, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #755
Assignees
@jessetan
Labels
Bug A bug

Comments

@lazka
Copy link

lazka commented Apr 19, 2019

Example rst:

Foo:
    Bar
Bla:
    Blub

Before (1.8.3):

old

Now (2.0.1):

new
@janheindejong
Copy link

Had the same... See #750

@bikeshedder
Copy link

Sphinx 2.0 also causes very ugly looking footnotes:

Screenshot from 2019-04-26 13-57-48

@jessetan jessetan self-assigned this Apr 28, 2019
@jessetan jessetan added the Bug A bug label Apr 28, 2019
This was referenced Apr 28, 2019
Closed
Merged
@seisman seisman mentioned this issue May 2, 2019
Closed
@idnsunset
Copy link

Sphinx 2.0 changes class attribute from docutils to class in <dl> tag, which has style rule .rst-content dl:not(.docutils) get matched.

@utensil utensil mentioned this issue May 30, 2019
Closed
@weiji14 weiji14 mentioned this issue Jan 12, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jessetan jessetan

Labels
Bug A bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Scope autodoc styling to .class and .data for Sphinx 2.0 readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme
5 participants
@lazka @bikeshedder @jessetan @janheindejong @idnsunset