You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As more and more people start implementing this spec, confusion arrises on a few common spec points. For example distinguishing: hot / cold, persistent / (ephemeral / transient?) or unicast / multicast (fan-out?) is an exercise each implementor does on his own when they get to some point of their implementation...
I would like to propose we collect common terms like these used by implementors and maybe "hints" or "examples". The goal of this would be to be less strict than the spec, but give new implementors some food for thought etc. This could be either a wiki on reactive-streams/reactive-streams or another project that can be modified without the full cycle of voting that makes sense for the spec, but less so for such collection of notes.
Would there be interest to discuss and update such docs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
losslessly backpressurizable or not? (where lossless == without dropping)
produces the same elements to each subscriber or not? (persistent/transient?)
multicast or unicast? (produces data independently or dependently to subscribers)
As more and more people start implementing this spec, confusion arrises on a few common spec points. For example distinguishing:
hot / cold
,persistent / (ephemeral / transient?)
orunicast / multicast (fan-out?)
is an exercise each implementor does on his own when they get to some point of their implementation...I would like to propose we collect common terms like these used by implementors and maybe "hints" or "examples". The goal of this would be to be less strict than the spec, but give new implementors some food for thought etc. This could be either a wiki on reactive-streams/reactive-streams or another project that can be modified without the full cycle of voting that makes sense for the spec, but less so for such collection of notes.
Would there be interest to discuss and update such docs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: