Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconnect to LDAP via load balancer hostname #3088

Closed
davelee53 opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Reconnect to LDAP via load balancer hostname #3088

davelee53 opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@davelee53
Copy link

davelee53 commented Jun 8, 2021

hi,
We are running into the issue that our RabbitMQ LDAP plugin is failing to reconnect to the LDAP cluster via a loadbalancer. We have some ldap server nodes that are all connected via the loadbalancer hostname like ldaps://ldap.
We periodically have to cycle our ldap server nodes for maintenance. Therefore any cached/pooled connections to the ldap node that is being cycled will be disconnected. It seems this ldap plugin is not able to purge those connections if they were established via virtual or load balancer hostname. We are currently using RabbitMQ v3.7.25 which should have the fix from this previous reported issue.
Our current configurations:
auth_ldap.servers.1 = ldap (a single connection to the loadbalancer host)
auth_ldap.connection_pool_size = 256
auth_ldap.idle_timeout = 50000

Thanks!

@michaelklishin
Copy link
Member

I will convert this issue to a GitHub discussion. Currently GitHub will automatically close and lock the issue even though your question will be transferred and responded to elsewhere. This is to let you know that we do not intend to ignore this but this is how the current GitHub conversion mechanism makes it seem for the users :(

@rabbitmq rabbitmq locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 8, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants