-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow editing gdal commands in processing #19619
Comments
Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
|
Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
|
Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
|
Author Name: Alexander Bruy (@alexbruy) We already have field with generated GDAL command, but if I'm not wrpng, it is not editable yet.
|
Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
|
Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav) Still true in QGIS 3. Unsure whether this is still an issue, as commands should be editable in the Processing history, for all algs.
|
Author Name: Nyall Dawson (@nyalldawson)
|
Author Name: Nyall Dawson (@nyalldawson) I'd be inclined to close this as a "won't-fix". The command line is shown only as a shortcut for people developing batch files and for execution outside of QGIS. There's no real way to fit an editable command into the processing world. Alternative options would be:
Or
|
Author Name: Nyall Dawson (@nyalldawson)
|
Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav) I understand well your point. Same thing applies to other backends (grass, saga). |
Author Name: Nicolas Cadieux (@NicolasCadieux) Nyall Dawson wrote:
Hi, I can't figure out how to add a comment without modifying the comment. Perhaps the "cite" button is the only way... anyways, I agree with Paolo that this is a major setback as the old tool really permitted users to learn the gdal command lines. It also gave flexibility. I agree that a "other command" parameter would be one way to go. Still, it would be important to see the list of files being used (in the case of gdalbuiltvrt). Currently all we see is that the file list will be created in (buildvrtInputFiles.txt). This is important as the order of the files is important in this module. Sorry if I messed up your comment. I will only see if I did this correctly after I press the "send" button! Nicolas |
Author Name: Jürgen Fischer (@jef-n)
|
Author Name: Sfkeller - (Sfkeller -) I'd like to support this feature request turning the output command text field of the dialog into an editable text field (referring to #29793). My test case and goal is to call e.g. "gdal_grid" as follows:
The parameters "-txe 50 350 -tye 650 450 -outsize 3 2" are currently unreachable through the processing dialog (i.e. they are not layer output creation options). Think also about the -sql option. |
I'm +1 to what @nyalldawson said. Editing command line does not fit into Processing world. |
Passing additional command line parameters Implemented in c224a01. I think we can close this now. |
Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav)
Original Redmine Issue: 11323
Redmine category:processing/gdal
See the implementation in GDALTools itself. Thi, together with the next feature req, would allow to get rid of the duplication between GDALTools and Processing
Related issue(s): #22568 (relates), #23032 (duplicates), #28451 (duplicates)
Redmine related issue(s): 14600, 15090, 20631
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: