Exanding the fractions those who think only in columns

[mike-engel]

I've run into some designers coding their portfolios and other basic websites who only think in column widths. They aren't math oriented, and thus have a harder time associating reduced fractions with column widths. This shouldn't add any bloat, and will make it more usable to those who prefer column based class notation.

[tilomitra]

This makes sense to me. @ericf, what do you think?

[ericf]

@mike-engel Grids is based on a 24 unit grid. If these redundant fractions were to be added, shouldn't they all have a 24 denominator?

[mike-engel]

@ericf I could add those in as well. I would say a majority of designers deal with a 12 column grid, however, instead of a 24 column one. It's a possibility to expand for both 12 and 24 columns.

[ericf]

I would say a majority of designers deal with a 12 column grid, however, instead of a 24 column one. It's a possibility to expand for both 12 and 24 columns.

@mike-engel I think this shows that the current classnames which use reduced fractions are probably best, especially given that we're planning a revamp of the Grids system: #146. I think this best place for this, given the desire for customization, would be the Grid Builder. @tilomitra would you be up for implementing this feature in Grid Builder?

[tilomitra]

@tilomitra would you be up for implementing this feature in Grid Builder?

Yeah, I can do that. We can link to it from the Grids page. I agree that we should hold off on this until the new grids gets merged in. I think that's a little easier to work with anyway.

[ericf]

Closing in favor of #245