You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As I understand it, the protocols in wayland-x11-compat-protocols are modifications of unmerged protocols in wayland-protocols. However, it's conceivable that some future revision of one of those protocols might use the same protocol or interface name. As such, would it make sense to put a prefix (such as x11compat_) on the interface name (and removing wayland-protocols prefixes such as xdg_ or ext_)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As I understand it, the protocols in wayland-x11-compat-protocols are modifications of unmerged protocols in wayland-protocols. However, it's conceivable that some future revision of one of those protocols might use the same protocol or interface name. As such, would it make sense to put a prefix (such as
x11compat_
) on the interface name (and removing wayland-protocols prefixes such asxdg_
orext_
)?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: