Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

oidc: SCIM compliance #320

Closed
jainh opened this issue Dec 9, 2016 · 11 comments
Closed

oidc: SCIM compliance #320

jainh opened this issue Dec 9, 2016 · 11 comments
Labels
rfc A request for comments to discuss and share ideas.

Comments

@jainh
Copy link

jainh commented Dec 9, 2016

Hi,
Does OpenID Connect implementation support the following draft Draft ?
Also, how to integrate SCIM within the hydra and harmonize it with existing OpenID connect?

@aeneasr
Copy link
Member

aeneasr commented Dec 10, 2016

No SCIM is not supported. What is dex?

@aeneasr aeneasr added question stale Feedback from one or more authors is required to proceed. labels Dec 11, 2016
@jainh
Copy link
Author

jainh commented Dec 12, 2016

@arekkas Typo corrected, is it possible to create proposal and priority for SCIM support through Hydra ?

@aeneasr
Copy link
Member

aeneasr commented Dec 12, 2016

@jainh I'm so sorry, but I don't understand what you are saying

@aeneasr aeneasr removed the stale Feedback from one or more authors is required to proceed. label Dec 12, 2016
@jainh
Copy link
Author

jainh commented Dec 12, 2016

@arekkas "dex" i put was typo corrected it to Hydra but my question is as per draft following is what the specification define:
" Discovery metadata indicating the availability of a SCIM protocol base endpoint.
Dynamic registration metadata that is used to indicate a clients intent to use the SCIM protocol and its associated endpoint.
An additional ID Token claim which specifies the SCIM resource endpoint and identifier associated with the authenticate subject.
In addition to the above metadata attributes and claims, the specification will also show how a client MAY access the SCIM endpoint."
So, is it possible OpenID connect implementation in hydra can support these attributes (scim_id, scim_location, scim_profile, scim_endpoint) ?

@aeneasr
Copy link
Member

aeneasr commented Dec 12, 2016

I see, Hydra itself is currently not working with SCIM. I am unfortunately very unfamiliar with SCIM itself and would have to study it first before I can give an answer if it is realistic that Hydra will support SCIM and if so, how that support would look like. The OpenID Connect Profile for SCIM Services draft is very young and quite sparse in description. For example, it's not clear to me where the metadata will be served.

I fear that I can not help you right now, and SCIM is currently not a priority.

@jainh
Copy link
Author

jainh commented Dec 13, 2016

@arekkas would you ok to accept help, if one needs to add support for SCIM ?

@aeneasr
Copy link
Member

aeneasr commented Dec 13, 2016

Sure, always open to pull requests!

@aeneasr aeneasr changed the title SCIM integration with OpenID Connect oidc: SCIM integration Dec 13, 2016
@aeneasr aeneasr added feat New feature or request. request and removed question feat New feature or request. labels Dec 13, 2016
@jainh
Copy link
Author

jainh commented Dec 13, 2016

@arekkas can you point the documentation and suggestion where to look in the code, before adding support for the SCIM?

@aeneasr
Copy link
Member

aeneasr commented Dec 13, 2016

As I said I don't know how SCIM works so I can't point you to the right parts. Unfortunately, you have to figure it out yourself. Feel free to come back if you have more specific questions.

@aeneasr aeneasr changed the title oidc: SCIM integration oidc: SCIM compliance Dec 13, 2016
@aeneasr
Copy link
Member

aeneasr commented Jan 2, 2017

Closing because we currently don't have capacities to implement SCIM compliance. Please ask on gitter if you have further questions.

@aeneasr aeneasr closed this as completed Jan 2, 2017
@aeneasr aeneasr added rfc A request for comments to discuss and share ideas. and removed request labels Aug 20, 2020
@supercairos
Copy link

Is there any plans to reopen this issue since the SCIM standard has evolved to a more mature RFC ? Maybe in Kratos ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rfc A request for comments to discuss and share ideas.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants