Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 104 Addresses to existing DOI/DAI (Support Check Values) #790

Closed
dlabordus opened this issue May 30, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Add 104 Addresses to existing DOI/DAI (Support Check Values) #790

dlabordus opened this issue May 30, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@dlabordus
Copy link
Contributor

dlabordus commented May 30, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As a 104 Engineer I want to add Address Elements to a existing DAI with the name 'Check' when creating Address for a existing DOI without Address Elements.

Describe the solution you'd like
Extend the existing logic to support the new CDC types from issue #698.
If a DOI Element has a DAI Element with name 'Check' the Engineer is asked when adding Address for the selected DOI if there should also be Address Elements added to the DAI Element ('Check') (Default 'false'). (PrepareAddress Screen)
If the Engineer selects the Address Elements should be created 2 Address Elements are created, one with the value 'interlocking' for the attribute 'check' and the other with the value 'synchrocheck' for the attribute 'check'.

Additional information
No additional information

@dlabordus dlabordus added the Kind: Enhancement New Request label May 30, 2022
@dlabordus
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Sander3003, the logic to determine when check is needed and which values are allowed? Hard-code values from the specification or maybe something with the NSD File (ask Jakob?).

@Sander3003
Copy link
Member

I cannot any information in the NSD files.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants