[PRE REVIEW]: amisrsynthdata: A Python package for generating synthetic data for the Advanced Modular Incoherent Scatter Radars

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @ljlamarche (Leslie Lamarche)
Repository: https://github.com/amisr/amisrsynthdata
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v1.1.3
Editor: @mbobra
Reviewers: @rweigel, @peijin94
Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bff6c9a069307dd62bebd57e476352b8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bff6c9a069307dd62bebd57e476352b8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bff6c9a069307dd62bebd57e476352b8/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bff6c9a069307dd62bebd57e476352b8)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ljlamarche. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ljlamarche if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.jastp.2009.01.009 is OK
- 10.1029/2007RS003805 is OK
- 10.1029/2019JA027112 is OK
- 10.1002/2014RS005519 is OK
- 10.17226/13060 is OK
- 10.1029/2004RS003042 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6575970 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00580 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cartopy: a cartographic python library with a Matp...

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (1297.5 files/s, 145772.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          13            444            759           1468
reStructuredText                11            216            127            364
YAML                             8             89             72            310
TeX                              1             13              0            138
TOML                             1              7              0             49
Markdown                         1             15              0             31
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            37            796            966           2395
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   198	Leslie Lamarche

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 896

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[dfm]

@ljlamarche — Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

EISPAC - The EIS Python Analysis Code
Submitting author: @MJWeberg
Handling editor: @mbobra (Active)
Reviewers: @nabobalis, @PaulJWright
Similarity score: 0.7352

SNEWPY: A Data Pipeline from Supernova Simulations to Neutrino Signals
Submitting author: @JostMigenda
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @apizzuto, @PeterDenton
Similarity score: 0.7325

diyepw: A Python package for Do-It-Yourself EnergyPlus weather file generation
Submitting author: @amandadsmith
Handling editor: @timtroendle (Retired)
Reviewers: @samuelduchesne, @fneum
Similarity score: 0.7230

pyradiosky: A Python package for Radio Sky Models
Submitting author: @bhazelton
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @pritchardn, @0xCoto
Similarity score: 0.7229

The Python Sky Model 3 software
Submitting author: @zonca
Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired)
Reviewers: @patricialarsen, @smsharma
Similarity score: 0.7192

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[dfm]

@editorialbot invite @mbobra as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[mbobra]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @mbobra is now the editor

[mbobra]

@ljlamarche Thanks for your submission! If you have any suggestions for reviewers, please let me know here (you can give me the Github handle without @ mentioning them, e.g. mbobra instead of @mbobra).

[ljlamarche]

Anyone from the PyHC community would probably be good. Additionally jswoboda, klaundal, or billetd. Thanks you!

[mbobra]

👋 @ljlamarche I am still working on finding reviewers!

[mbobra]

@editorialbot add @rweigel as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@rweigel added to the reviewers list!

[mbobra]

@editorialbot add @peijin94 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@peijin94 added to the reviewers list!

[mbobra]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7248.

[mbobra]

👋 @ljlamarche @rweigel @peijin94 See you over in #7248 where the review will take place!