Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: logo cloud #928

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

feat: logo cloud #928

merged 7 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

seaerchin
Copy link
Contributor

Problem

we want to add a logo cloud for agencies - this will mostly be a collection of images

Solution

  1. add logo cloud with support for images

add base logo cloud component
@seaerchin seaerchin requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2024 06:11
@datadog-opengovsg
Copy link

datadog-opengovsg bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: feat/logo-cloud
Commit report: b5ce695
Test service: isomer-studio

✅ 0 Failed, 232 Passed, 36 Skipped, 46.79s Total Time
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.03%)

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

  • vitest run --coverage 3.97% (-0.03%) - Details

Copy link
Contributor

@adriangohjw adriangohjw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

curious - why aren't we defining the schema packages/components/src/interfaces/complex/ ?

saw that it's fixed in #930

@seaerchin seaerchin merged commit bd94034 into main Dec 17, 2024
18 of 20 checks passed
@seaerchin seaerchin deleted the feat/logo-cloud branch December 17, 2024 08:05
<div className="px-10 py-12">
<div className="flex flex-col gap-4">
<p className="prose-headline-base-medium self-center text-base-content-light">
{title ?? "With support from these agencies"}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

btw title is required and won't be falsy? just checking if this is just a preventive measures?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes defensive! reason why is because this is written to disk and read back (+ done manually)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants