Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Height in Advanced Editor [FC-0076] #1649

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ChrisChV
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisChV ChrisChV commented Feb 5, 2025

Description

  • Updates the height of the Advanced Editor.
  • Which edX user roles will this change impact? "Course Author"

Supporting information

Testing instructions

  • Go to a course. Go to Advanced settings
  • Add the following in Advanced module list:
[
    "done",
    "google-calendar",
    "google-document",
    "pdf",
]
  • Install the PDF plugging
  • Create and copy a completion block
  • Go to the library home of a library. Paste the block.
  • Open the Editor. Verify the style, and verify that the text does not overlap with the close button.
  • Also verify that the editor has a good size.
  • Also verify that the Save and Cancel buttons are on the right side.
  • Also verify that the buttons are at the bottom of the modal.
  • On the course unit, create and copy a PDF block.
  • Go to the library and paste the block.
  • Open the Editor. Verify the style of the Save and Cancel buttons.
  • Also verify that the Save and Cancel buttons are on the right side.
  • Also verify that the buttons are at the bottom of the modal.
  • On the course unit, create and copy a Google Document block.
  • Go to the library and paste the block.
  • Open the Editor. Verify that the Save and Cancel buttons are on the right side and the bottom of the modal.

Other information

N/A

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Feb 5, 2025
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, @ChrisChV!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/2u-tnl.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.


Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.24%. Comparing base (31f39cb) to head (bfc12d1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1649   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.24%   93.24%           
=======================================
  Files        1100     1101    +1     
  Lines       21803    21860   +57     
  Branches     4632     4644   +12     
=======================================
+ Hits        20330    20384   +54     
- Misses       1408     1411    +3     
  Partials       65       65           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@pomegranited pomegranited left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to making the editor modal larger -- that makes it easier to edit the most commonly-used XBlocks, though it's a bit weird for the ones tested here, as they don't have enough fields to fill the full 80vh.

e.g. Google Document:

image

PDF:

image

Completion:

image

  • I tested this using the PR test instructions.
  • I read through the code
  • I checked for accessibility issues N/A
  • Includes documentation N/A
  • User-facing strings are extracted for translation N/A

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ export const LibraryBlock = ({
view,
}: LibraryBlockProps) => {
const iframeRef = useRef<HTMLIFrameElement>(null);
const [iFrameHeight, setIFrameHeight] = useState(50);
const defaultiFrameHeight = view === 'studio_view' ? 80 : 50;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I think this would be clearer if you moved the line from below up here and used its value:

Suggested change
const defaultiFrameHeight = view === 'studio_view' ? 80 : 50;
const xblockView = view ?? 'student_view';
const defaultiFrameHeight = xblockView === 'studio_view' ? 80 : 50;

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed bfc12d1

@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 added the FC Relates to an Axim Funded Contribution project label Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FC Relates to an Axim Funded Contribution project open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U
Projects
Status: Waiting on Author
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants