Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for a batched VIT Tracker #286

Open
Greendogo opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Add support for a batched VIT Tracker #286

Greendogo opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
question It is not an issue but rather a user question

Comments

@Greendogo
Copy link

I don't have access to the original model files the ONNX was built with, but it would be great to treat the VIT Tracker like a multi-object tracker.

@Greendogo Greendogo changed the title Add support batched VIT Tracker Add support for a batched VIT Tracker Feb 19, 2025
@fengyuentau
Copy link
Member

Hello, thank you for bringing the discussion. I believe that multi-object tracking is another topic that needs a different design on the model and the algorithm. You could google it (maybe ask chat bots) and compare.

@fengyuentau fengyuentau added the question It is not an issue but rather a user question label Feb 19, 2025
@Greendogo
Copy link
Author

I believe you can use VIT Tracker, but you need access to the model files that the ONNX was built with so you can export with dynamic_axes enabled and configured.

Maybe we should start there, can someone post a link to the file the ONNX for VIT Tracker was built with?

I was looking at what I believe is some of the original work for this tracker, and it looks like dynamic_axes was disabled for the OpenCV release:
https://github.com/lpylpy0514/VitTracker/blob/c54555b53bc4abf03eab215085fb7ca10a6bc568/tracking/onnxexport.py#L398

@SRai22
Copy link

SRai22 commented Feb 19, 2025

@lpylpy0514

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question It is not an issue but rather a user question
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants