Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Seccomp Errno, return code #960

Closed
sargun opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Seccomp Errno, return code #960

sargun opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@sargun
Copy link

sargun commented Mar 14, 2018

Currently, there is no way to specify the errno code when in LinuxSeccomp policies. It would be nice to be able to specify it.
@flx42
Copy link

flx42 commented May 31, 2018

Ping, I would also like this to be added in the spec.

Looks like the spec doesn't even mention which value of errno should be used. runc uses EPERM so maybe this should be called out as a first step.

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Jun 2, 2018

Previous discussion here. I'm still in favor of either making this configurable or adding a requirement for runtimes to use EPERM.

@mauriciovasquezbernal
Copy link

Solved by #1041?

@cyphar
Copy link
Member

cyphar commented Nov 13, 2020

Yeah this was fixed by #1041.

@cyphar cyphar closed this as completed Nov 13, 2020
@kallisti5 kallisti5 mentioned this issue Sep 1, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@wking @sargun @cyphar @flx42 @mauriciovasquezbernal