Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v4.0.x: Be a little less restrictive on interface requirements #6967

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2019
Merged

v4.0.x: Be a little less restrictive on interface requirements #6967

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2019

Conversation

rhc54
Copy link
Contributor

@rhc54 rhc54 commented Sep 9, 2019

If both types of interfaces are enabled, don't error out if one of them
isn't able to open listener sockets. Only one interface family may be
available on some machines, but someone might want to build the code to
run more generally.

Refs openpmix/prrte#249
Refs #6960

Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 06d188e)

If both types of interfaces are enabled, don't error out if one of them
isn't able to open listener sockets. Only one interface family may be
available on some machines, but someone might want to build the code to
run more generally.

Refs openpmix/prrte#249

Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 06d188e)
@rhc54 rhc54 added the bug label Sep 9, 2019
@rhc54 rhc54 added this to the v4.0.2 milestone Sep 9, 2019
@rhc54 rhc54 requested a review from jsquyres September 9, 2019 14:55
@rhc54 rhc54 self-assigned this Sep 9, 2019
@jsquyres jsquyres changed the title Be a little less restrictive on interface requirements v4.0.x: Be a little less restrictive on interface requirements Sep 9, 2019
@gpaulsen gpaulsen merged commit 287ee15 into open-mpi:v4.0.x Sep 9, 2019
@ibm-ompi
Copy link

The IBM CI (XL Compiler) build failed! Please review the log, linked below.

Gist: https://gist.github.com/ibm-ompi/88b480fb98dfd2bdac939f023e1f8fe6

@rhc54 rhc54 deleted the cmr40x/oob branch November 27, 2019 19:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants