Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support all dynamic zones options for okta_network_zone #476

Closed
lilley2412 opened this issue May 18, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #599
Closed

Support all dynamic zones options for okta_network_zone #476

lilley2412 opened this issue May 18, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #599
Labels
enhancement Asking for new behavior or feature

Comments

@lilley2412
Copy link

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

The okta_network_zone resource does not support all dynamic zone configuration options. Only country codes may be provided, and the IP Type is always "Any". The okta_network_zone resource should support the Tor Anonymizer proxy and ISP ASN fields.

New or Affected Resource(s)

okta_network_zone

Potential Terraform Configuration

resource "okta_network_zone" "example" {
  name     = "example"
  type     = "DYNAMIC"
  ip_type = "Any | Any Proxy | Tor anonymizer proxy | Not Tor anonymizer proxy"
  locations = ["ISO-CODE"]
  isp_asns = ["asn"]
}

References

n/a

@lilley2412 lilley2412 added the enhancement Asking for new behavior or feature label May 18, 2021
@bogdanprodan-okta
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @lilley2412! Thanks for submitting this issue! I'll investigate the possibility to add these and create a corresponding PR.

@lucascantor
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like this is at least partially resolved in #522

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Asking for new behavior or feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants