-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 372
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When there is a package conflict, state where the dependencies come from #5243
Comments
In this case it turns out the issue was a |
This is a duplicate of #4373. Could you add your comment there with:
and close this issue? |
Uh, no idea how to get all that information, sorry.
You can see the full CI logs here. I also now remember that |
This should have been fixed by #6106 released in opam 2.3.0. If you still have some issues, feel free to reopen or open a new ticket. Thanks for the report! |
I am trying to figure out why opam fails saying
Sadly this is on CI, so I have no way to directly interact with that state. And the message makes no sense, no package involved should have a constraint that says
< dev.2017-11-12.2
. It would help enormously if opam could say why it thinks that there is a< dev.2017-11-12.2
constraint; as-is, these error messages are not very useful.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: