You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This, for me at least, makes archiving builds a little fiddly, since the actual app files are a directory removed from the dir with the app name pattern. I would like the output to look like this instead:
This would allow me to more quickly archive the applications, because now both the application name and the system+architecture are going to automatically be put in the archive name.
Currently I need to re-arrange and rename the dirs to get this effect, or manually name the archive.
Perhaps the system and architecture could be presented as a pattern option instead, for example %(target) or similar, and remove the previously used subdir?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That's a good idea. I think it's a useful thing to be able to choose how to use the system and architecture. It wouldn't be too hard to add an option like this, so I'll add it when I have some more free time.
(I hit enter after writing the title...)
Currently Web2Exe exports the built application into a structure like this:
This, for me at least, makes archiving builds a little fiddly, since the actual app files are a directory removed from the dir with the app name pattern. I would like the output to look like this instead:
This would allow me to more quickly archive the applications, because now both the application name and the system+architecture are going to automatically be put in the archive name.
Currently I need to re-arrange and rename the dirs to get this effect, or manually name the archive.
Perhaps the system and architecture could be presented as a pattern option instead, for example %(target) or similar, and remove the previously used subdir?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: