This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
v4: Review "Available Frameworks" functionality in view of pluggable agents #887
Labels
Breaking Change
Moved to Discussion
V4
All issues related to V4 - use -label:V4 to get non-V4 issues
Milestone
Currently the engine must know about all available frameworks, to expose a list via the RuntimeFrameworkService to a runner, and validate the RequestedRuntimeFramework option.
This is a source of technical debt and a maintenance requirement for a number of legacy runtimes, and new runtimes that become available. We need to decide what this functionality would look like in a world of dynamic runtime availability and pluggable agents. Should the agent be responsible for announcing what frameworks it can run on?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: