You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, FactorHistogram treats 0, +- 1, and numbers without known factorizations all the same, as having 0 factors. I don't mind 0 and +-1 all being lumped together, but numbers of absolute value 2 or more, the factorizations of which are not known, should be treated differently. They certainly have some number of factors, we just don't know how many. So they should either be removed from the count altogether, or they should be in a separate "unknown" bar or be considered to have "-1" factors, or something along those lines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, FactorHistogram treats 0, +- 1, and numbers without known factorizations all the same, as having 0 factors. I don't mind 0 and +-1 all being lumped together, but numbers of absolute value 2 or more, the factorizations of which are not known, should be treated differently. They certainly have some number of factors, we just don't know how many. So they should either be removed from the count altogether, or they should be in a separate "unknown" bar or be considered to have "-1" factors, or something along those lines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: