Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specify additional "genomes" of spike-in controls for downstream calculation of bisulfite conversion efficiency #394

Open
pdemko opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pdemko
Copy link

pdemko commented Apr 1, 2024

Description of feature

Library preparation kits come with unmethylated and methylated DNA controls that are added to samples (e.g. NEBNext EM-seq). It would be useful to supply methylseq with the fasta sequences of the controls and have it perform additional alignment, deduplication, and extraction using those references. This would help enable calculation of bisulfite/enzymatic conversion efficiency.

Thank you for providing this excellent pipeline!

@pdemko pdemko added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 1, 2024
@cjfields
Copy link

cjfields commented Apr 8, 2024

At the moment, we're basically including them as part of the main reference genome FASTA and analyzing outside of methylseq. Having a way to include them separately would also be useful so additional spike-in specific analyses could be performed.

@PanosProv
Copy link

Hello everybody,

Since I also need this feature, I am willing to develop it as part of the methylseq pipeline. Please see this conversation in slack.

@trum994
Copy link

trum994 commented Feb 1, 2025

I'm new to methylseq analysis. One of the scientists in our lab need to run the analysis against the positive and negative control sequences (pUC19 and Lambda). I think this is the feature you're trying to add. What's the current status and how can I contribute?

@PanosProv
Copy link

PanosProv commented Feb 4, 2025

Hello @trum994, I have worked on it before Christmas and have had some progress. It needs some more work though and I will resume it this week (busy with other things in the meantime). I am also just learning NextFlow , so I am not the fastest at implementing it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants