Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix remark warnings for Daemon README #6920

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2019
Merged

Fix remark warnings for Daemon README #6920

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2019

Conversation

prhomhyse
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This PR fixes remark lint warnings for the README Daemon.

Related: #5941

Component Name

Docs

Additional Information

Fixing this warning [table-pipe-alignment] Misaligned table fence causes the table not to render on GitHub and MkDocs. That's why I am leaving it as is.

@squash-labs
Copy link

squash-labs bot commented Sep 23, 2019

Manage this branch in Squash

Test this branch here: https://prhomhyseremark-lint-daemon-czlgi.squash.io

Copy link
Contributor

@joelhans joelhans left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few requests here. Please see #6917 for my comment about line wrapping, as that applies here too.

@joelhans joelhans merged commit 9d06d0f into netdata:master Oct 3, 2019
Saruspete pushed a commit to Saruspete/netdata that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2019
* fix remark warnings for daemon README

* rewrap and indent to make it easier to read

* make character limit to 120 not 80
jackyhuang85 pushed a commit to jackyhuang85/netdata that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2020
* fix remark warnings for daemon README

* rewrap and indent to make it easier to read

* make character limit to 120 not 80
Saruspete pushed a commit to Saruspete/netdata that referenced this pull request May 21, 2020
* fix remark warnings for daemon README

* rewrap and indent to make it easier to read

* make character limit to 120 not 80
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants