Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clean up obsolete mentions of graphene in official docs #16059

Closed
jeffgdotorg opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Clean up obsolete mentions of graphene in official docs #16059

jeffgdotorg opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
type: documentation A change or addition to the documentation

Comments

@jeffgdotorg
Copy link
Contributor

Change Type

Correction

Area

Development

Proposed Changes

While triaging #16024 I noticed that the docs still refer to graphene in a few places where strawberry should be. The needed updates span several doc areas; I picked Development because it came up first alphabetically. I think this list captures all the files that need touching:

  • development/adding-models.md
  • integrations/graphql-api.md
  • plugins/development/graphql-api.md
@jeffgdotorg jeffgdotorg added type: documentation A change or addition to the documentation status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation labels May 9, 2024
@arthanson arthanson self-assigned this May 9, 2024
@arthanson arthanson removed the status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation label May 9, 2024
@arthanson
Copy link
Collaborator

@jeffgdotorg can you please check the latest docs, I think these were all cleaned up in a previous PR. Searching the codebase for graphene shows nothing except in release notes and such.

@arthanson arthanson removed their assignment May 13, 2024
@jeffgdotorg
Copy link
Contributor Author

I had feature checked out when I made the list above. If that's expected at this stage, then this issue is moot.

@jeffgdotorg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Disregard, I had the wrong branch checked out.

@jeffgdotorg jeffgdotorg closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 13, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 12, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type: documentation A change or addition to the documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@arthanson @jeffgdotorg