Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support borsh schema type for schema definition #392

Closed
Tracked by #391
ailisp opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #391

Support borsh schema type for schema definition #392

ailisp opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@fospring
Labels
v2.0+

Comments

@ailisp
Copy link
Member

ailisp commented Apr 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Use borsh schema type to define contract schema. Basically it should look like: #377 (comment)
WIP in #382
@ailisp ailisp added the v2.0 label Apr 19, 2024
@ailisp ailisp mentioned this issue Apr 19, 2024
Closed
@ailisp ailisp moved this to Ready in near-sdk-js May 1, 2024
@ailisp ailisp moved this from Ready to In progress in near-sdk-js May 1, 2024
@ailisp ailisp moved this from In progress to Blocked in near-sdk-js May 3, 2024
@ailisp ailisp added v2.0+ and removed v2.0 labels May 7, 2024
@ailisp ailisp moved this from Blocked to Done in near-sdk-js May 7, 2024
@ailisp ailisp closed this as completed by moving to Done in near-sdk-js May 7, 2024
@ailisp
Copy link
Member Author

ailisp commented May 7, 2024 •
edited
Loading

not finished yet but given the timeframe we will make this in a later version

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@fospring fospring

Labels
v2.0+
Projects
near-sdk-js
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ailisp @fospring