HQ railroad raster sample data doesn't represent railroads

[dcdenu4]

In working on a threat decay issue with HQ I noticed that the railroad threat raster didn't match the railroad class in the LULC raster. It instead looks like the railroad threat raster is mimicking the residential LULC class.

The HQ sample data should be updated to fix this discrepancy which could influence the HQ tests.

[emilyanndavis]

@dcdenu4, I've updated the railroad threat rasters in the sample data repo.

I also ran invest-autotest and invest-autovalidate while pointing to the updated data locally and verified those tests passed.

I couldn't find any references to the sample data in the HQ model test suite (it seems to generating a lot—if not all—of its test data on the fly). Before I update the revision hash, could you double-check test_habitat_quality.py and make sure I'm not missing something obvious?

[emilyanndavis]

Before I update the revision hash, could you double-check test_habitat_quality.py and make sure I'm not missing something obvious?

Actually, no need! I was able to pull the updated sample data and run all the model tests, and everything passed.