We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Once #1728 is implemented, there will not be any further consumers for nni_timer, and we should just remove it.
The timer has some serious scalability issues, and similar functionality can be obtained with nni_sleep_aio.
nni_sleep_aio
Shrinking the code size is a win too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This also eliminates a thread we don't need. Which will make some folks happy.
Sorry, something went wrong.
ca63231
No branches or pull requests
Once #1728 is implemented, there will not be any further consumers for nni_timer, and we should just remove it.
The timer has some serious scalability issues, and similar functionality can be obtained with
nni_sleep_aio
.Shrinking the code size is a win too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: