Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Property probing can be unnecessarily expensive #4

Open
mrkkrp opened this issue Jun 16, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Property probing can be unnecessarily expensive #4

mrkkrp opened this issue Jun 16, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
performance

Comments

@mrkkrp
Copy link
Owner

mrkkrp commented Jun 16, 2018

Espectially when we want to prove several composed properties (using Via), every time we must first get projection of p from t `Via` p, which may be quite expensive.
@mrkkrp
Copy link
Owner Author

mrkkrp commented Jun 16, 2018

In general, could it be possible to run checkProp only once for a property no matter what we do? That would be on par performance-wise with that a programmer would write manually. I think it may be doable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
performance
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mrkkrp