Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I got a super overfitting problem when I train DIN #44

Open
Laugigabyte opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

I got a super overfitting problem when I train DIN #44

Laugigabyte opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@Laugigabyte
Copy link

I got a super overfitting problem when I train DIN finally, but first of all I'd like to point out some probelms

  1. We'd to use .split(" ") instead of .split("") when we split the history behavior part of the dataset?
  2. Related to point 1, shall we use + " " instead of + "" in building the history behavior part?
  3. After changing the above 2 points, I still got a very overfitting result that train accuracy of almost 1. and test accuracy of about 0.5 -0.6 only.
    Please give me some guideline if you could, thx.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant