Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reason about the calander conversation algorithm #16

Open
m3hari opened this issue May 1, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Reason about the calander conversation algorithm #16

m3hari opened this issue May 1, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@m3hari
Copy link
Contributor

m3hari commented May 1, 2017

Currently, the conversation algorithm seems to lack a research(mathematical) background. It just follows some kind of pattern.
I think the conversation algorithm need to be based on some decent research background.

The following links might be a reference

@m3hari m3hari changed the title A way to reason about the calander Conversation algorithm Reason about the calander conversation algorithm May 1, 2017
@miqe miqe self-assigned this May 1, 2017
@miqe
Copy link
Owner

miqe commented Jul 10, 2017

True, i came up with the patter with some research based on printed previous year calendar which are distributed by multiple companies. From my perspective its not the pattern/algorithm which is incorrect but the implementation. With the help of automated testing, which is on the previous commit 9f25327 the pattern/algorithm implementation can be perfected thus leading to a new way of converting Ethiopian date to Gregorian and vice versa.

@m3hari
Copy link
Contributor Author

m3hari commented Jul 20, 2017

Great! It would be awosem if the alogithm/pattern can be clearly included in the README section.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants