We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider the following:
styled
legacyStyled
createComponent
createComponent(view, { options });
defaultProps
getProps
fields
withSlots
getSlots
getClassNames
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@JasonGore should we close this as well?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Closing due to newer efforts that'll take an alternative approach to styled.
JasonGore
No branches or pull requests
Consider the following:
Fabric 7
styled
aslegacyStyled
from foundation.createComponent
export from OUFR.styled
to new legacy-styled package. (Probably should removelegacyStyled
from experiments.)styled
from utilities and OUFR.createComponent
API to easily allow quick component prototyping and customization, likecreateComponent(view, { options });
styled
?legacyStyled
, causes build errors in charting and other packages usingstyled
.createComponent
parity withstyled
defaultProps
,getProps
andfields
support as applicable.Improvements
withSlots
can be removed or made optional?getSlots
for simple component scenarios?getClassNames
in this case similar tostyled
?Fabric 8
styled
(or at least move to foundation.) Removestyled
export from OUFR.createComponent
tostyled
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: