Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package handling #20

Open
ggmarshall opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Package handling #20

ggmarshall opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@ggmarshall
Copy link
Contributor

At the moment snakemake is installed in its own mamba env when making a prodenv which is then used by each of the production cycles. Instead we could move to snakemake being in its own venv so different prod cycles can use different snakemake versions and extra packages can be installed such as pylegendmeta for snakemake to use outside the container. This could be handled by a modern package handler like uv (which would also handle the venv) thoughts @gipert ?

@Yuan-Ru-Lin

@gipert
Copy link
Member

gipert commented Dec 20, 2024

I think it's a good idea, also because Snakemake is now on PyPI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants