Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Promote ResourceQuota Tests to Conformance #78831

Closed
devaips opened this issue Jun 9, 2019 · 8 comments · Fixed by #78331
Closed

Promote ResourceQuota Tests to Conformance #78831

devaips opened this issue Jun 9, 2019 · 8 comments · Fixed by #78331
Assignees
@mgdevstack
Labels
area/conformance Issues or PRs related to kubernetes conformance tests area/test sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing.

Comments

@devaips
Copy link

devaips commented Jun 9, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Using the list of tested stable endpoints referenced in #78748, we can pick out the endpoints which are part of the ResourceQuota kind:

deleteCoreV1NamespacedResourceQuota

replaceCoreV1NamespacedResourceQuota

These are stable core endpoints which have existing testing, potentially making for low-hanging fruit to upgrade to Conformance.

/area test
/area conformance
/sig testing
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test area/conformance Issues or PRs related to kubernetes conformance tests sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Jun 9, 2019
@devaips
Copy link
Author

devaips commented Jun 12, 2019

Relevant PR: #78331

@draveness
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

@draveness
Copy link
Contributor

the createCoreV1NamespacedPersistentVolumeClaim is supposed to included in #78830 imo.

@devaips
Copy link
Author

devaips commented Jun 12, 2019

the createCoreV1NamespacedPersistentVolumeClaim is supposed to included in #78830 imo.

You're right, it was incorrect. I've changed it now. Thanks for noticing!

@draveness draveness mentioned this issue Jun 17, 2019
Closed
@draveness
Copy link
Contributor

/unassign

/assign @mgdevstack

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot assigned mgdevstack and unassigned draveness Jun 17, 2019
@devaips devaips mentioned this issue Jun 17, 2019
Closed
@hh
Copy link
Member

hh commented Jun 18, 2019

The specific tests that if promoted would increase Conformance Coverage by 2 endpoints:

[sig-scheduling] LimitRange should create a LimitRange with defaults and ensure pod has those defaults applied.

@hh hh mentioned this issue Jun 18, 2019
Closed
@hh
Copy link
Member

hh commented Jun 18, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Promoting #78748 will increase Conformance Coverage by 2 endpoints.

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Jun 27, 2019

/assign @mgdevstack

@mgdevstack mgdevstack mentioned this issue Jun 28, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mgdevstack mgdevstack

Labels
area/conformance Issues or PRs related to kubernetes conformance tests area/test sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
7 participants
@hh @spiffxp @timothysc @draveness @mgdevstack @k8s-ci-robot @devaips