-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
API Linting Tracking Issue #11834
Labels
help wanted
Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines.
kind/api-change
Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API
priority/important-soon
Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.
triage/accepted
Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Comments
Hi @JoelSpeed |
By all means! Just comment here before you pick up one of the rules to enable as between us I think we can open up the PRs in parallel for discussion |
This was referenced Feb 19, 2025
This was referenced Feb 27, 2025
I opened the PR for each linter to make it enabled |
I'm working on |
All yours :) Thx for working on this |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted
Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines.
kind/api-change
Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API
priority/important-soon
Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.
triage/accepted
Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
As part of #11733, we have configured KAL, that kube-api-linter to run against the APIs within this repository.
There are a number of linter rules that need to be reviewed and enabled 1 by 1.
This issue is to track the implementation of enabling each of these linters
TODO
Not doing
NoPhase
Per discussion in July 2024, we are keeping phase fields for now.
See #10897 (comment) and #10897 (comment) for the context on why we are still keeping phases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: