You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When giving the pod such settings that it will fail to start by crashing to a JVM fault, we still set the label starting and this happens after the Pod has crashed. Thus, leaving the cluster in a state that it looks to cass-operator that the pod is still starting while in reality this instance of the pod has never had any /start command applied to it.
What did you expect to happen?
No response
How can we reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
See comment #711 (review) , can be reproduced in kind environment at least.
cass-operator version
1.24-dev
Kubernetes version
1.32
Method of installation
No response
Anything else we need to know?
No response
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Story by Unito
┆Issue Number: CASS-93
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What happened?
When giving the pod such settings that it will fail to start by crashing to a JVM fault, we still set the label starting and this happens after the Pod has crashed. Thus, leaving the cluster in a state that it looks to cass-operator that the pod is still starting while in reality this instance of the pod has never had any /start command applied to it.
What did you expect to happen?
No response
How can we reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
See comment #711 (review) , can be reproduced in kind environment at least.
cass-operator version
1.24-dev
Kubernetes version
1.32
Method of installation
No response
Anything else we need to know?
No response
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Story by Unito
┆Issue Number: CASS-93
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: