How to deal with intended translations for ungrammatical forms?

[jrwdunham]

I've just followed the convention of putting "Intended: ..." into these types of translations(/glosses). (Alternatively, one could just put the intended translation without the prefix "Intended: " since that seems implicit, given that the form is marked as ungrammatical.) Are there any issues with just using the "Intended: " prefix as a convention? Should there be a separate field for this? If so, should it be separate from the "translation appropriateness" field?

The OLD doesn't use the translation information in any of its logic so "Intended: " in a translation string shouldn't mess anything up.

Another option would be that if a form is ungrammatical the system could just automatically display any translations with an "Intended: " prefix.

Can we think of scenarios where an ungrammatical form would have a translation and where calling that translation "intended" would be inaccurate?